FICTIONAL • PARODY • SATIRE

Dimaagi Naxal Party — questions are our manifesto
NON-PARTISANWe do not support or oppose any government, party or politician. We just ask questions.
INFRASTRUCTUREIndiaUNANSWERED

If the road was repaired within its warranty period, who paid — the contractor or the public?

Most road contracts carry a defect liability period. Re-tarring inside that window should be recovered from the contractor.

DISCUSS

WHY WE'RE ASKING

Because the same stretch should not be billed to citizens twice.

WHAT WE KNOW

  • Road contracts typically include a defect liability or warranty period.
  • Repair works are re-tendered and published on procurement portals.

WHAT WE DON'T KNOW

  • Which repaired stretches were still inside their warranty period?
  • How much has been recovered from contractors in the last three years?
  • Is there a public map of road works with contractor names and warranty dates?

SUPPORTING QUESTIONS

  1. 1.What is the defect liability period on this stretch, and on what date did it start?
  2. 2.How much has been spent per kilometre on repeat repairs in the last five years?
  3. 3.How much has actually been recovered from contractors under warranty clauses, in rupees?
  4. 4.Which engineer certified the last completion, and when is the next third-party audit due?

SOURCES & DOCUMENTS

  • No sources attached yet. This question is based on public reporting under review.

ANSWER TRACKING

ASKED 23 Aug 2026 · 0 RESPONSES · 0/3 EVIDENCE ITEMS IN

  1. QUESTION ASKED

  2. RESPONSE REQUESTED

  3. RESPONSE RECEIVED

  4. FACT CHECKED

  5. VERIFIED / DISPUTED

WHO HAS RESPONDED

No office has responded on the record yet. Requests remain open.

EVIDENCE PROVIDED

Nothing on the checklist has been supplied yet.

STILL OPEN (3)

  • DOCUMENT · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentSanctioned order or circular behind the decision
  • DATASET · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentMachine-readable data behind the claim
  • OFFICIAL TIMELINE · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentOfficial timeline with dates and owners

Tracking records what was asked and what came back. It is not a claim of wrongdoing by anyone.

EVIDENCE CHECKLIST

0/3 ON THE RECORD

The documents, datasets and official timelines we are asking for. Nothing here is an allegation — it is a request for material that would settle the question.

  • DOCUMENTREQUESTED

    Sanctioned order or circular behind the decision

    The signed order, notification or circular that authorised the action, with file number and date.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

  • DATASETREQUESTED

    Machine-readable data behind the claim

    A CSV or Excel release of the underlying numbers, district-wise, for the last five years.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

  • OFFICIAL TIMELINEREQUESTED

    Official timeline with dates and owners

    A dated sequence: when the issue was flagged, who reviewed it, what was decided, and by when it closes.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

Sign in to back a request or ask for new material.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.