FICTIONAL • PARODY • SATIRE

Dimaagi Naxal Party — questions are our manifesto
NON-PARTISANWe do not support or oppose any government, party or politician. We just ask questions.
INFRASTRUCTURESample CityRESPONSE REQUESTED

WHY HAS THIS PROJECT MISSED THREE DEADLINES?

A major sample infrastructure project has reportedly moved its completion date three times since it was announced.

DISCUSS

WHY WE'RE ASKING

Because each revision has a paper trail — an approval, a revised estimate, a signature — and none of that paper trail has been published together in one place.

WHAT WE KNOW

  • Three completion dates have been published for the same project.
  • A revised cost estimate appears in the sample tender record.
  • The corridor is partially open to traffic.

WHAT WE DON'T KNOW

  • Which authority approved each revision.
  • The cumulative amount spent to date.
  • Whether delay penalties were applied.

SUPPORTING QUESTIONS

  1. 1.WHO APPROVED THE ORIGINAL TIMELINE?
  2. 2.HOW MUCH HAS BEEN SPENT SO FAR?
  3. 3.WHAT IS THE DOCUMENTED REASON FOR EACH REVISION?
  4. 4.WHAT IS THE NEW COMPLETION DATE, AND WHO SIGNED IT?

SOURCES & DOCUMENTS

ANSWER TRACKING

ASKED 23 Aug 2026 · 0 RESPONSES · 0/3 EVIDENCE ITEMS IN

  1. QUESTION ASKED

  2. RESPONSE REQUESTED

  3. RESPONSE RECEIVED

  4. FACT CHECKED

  5. VERIFIED / DISPUTED

WHO HAS RESPONDED

No office has responded on the record yet. Requests remain open.

AWAITING: Sample Metropolitan Development Authority

EVIDENCE PROVIDED

Nothing on the checklist has been supplied yet.

STILL OPEN (3)

  • DOCUMENT · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentSanctioned order or circular behind the decision
  • DATASET · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentMachine-readable data behind the claim
  • OFFICIAL TIMELINE · REQUESTED · Concerned departmentOfficial timeline with dates and owners

Tracking records what was asked and what came back. It is not a claim of wrongdoing by anyone.

EVIDENCE CHECKLIST

0/3 ON THE RECORD

The documents, datasets and official timelines we are asking for. Nothing here is an allegation — it is a request for material that would settle the question.

  • DOCUMENTREQUESTED

    Sanctioned order or circular behind the decision

    The signed order, notification or circular that authorised the action, with file number and date.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

  • DATASETREQUESTED

    Machine-readable data behind the claim

    A CSV or Excel release of the underlying numbers, district-wise, for the last five years.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

  • OFFICIAL TIMELINEREQUESTED

    Official timeline with dates and owners

    A dated sequence: when the issue was flagged, who reviewed it, what was decided, and by when it closes.

    REQUESTED FROM: Concerned department

Sign in to back a request or ask for new material.

PUBLIC DISCUSSION (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.